Sarcodes: Centrepiece of a Medical Revoluton

Today I’m going to set out to describe, as best I can, the nature and basis of the most powerful and widely useful therapeutic intervention I know. Very few have ever set out to write an article on this specific subject – a shameful neglect which I hope will be countered by many more articles to come about sarcodes.

In the process, this will evolve into an introduction to the principal therapeutics used in the various forms of Living Systems Medicine, Field Control Therapy and Homeopathy. As to their diagnostic approaches – that’s beyond the scope of this article.

Over 80% of the remedies I give out in my clinic are “sarcodes.”

Huh? Say what? Sarcodes?

The likelihood is that your local doctor is not using “sarcodes” at all. . . ! They have not yet taken off in the mainstream.

But don’t let that deter you. They are at present the central driving force of a medical storm shaking up clinical practice globally. In short, since effective ways of using sarcodes in the treatment of many modern diseases were found, and especially over the past two decades, medicine can never again be the same.

If any readers have ever wondered what a “sarcode” is – or why it works as it does – don’t worry – I aim at least to give an introduction, overview and hopefully some food for thought on this below! Or in case you have never heard of a “sarcode” before, then let this be an introduction to a bold new trend in medicine.

To explain how sarcodes work, I’ll be referring to tuning forks, Elvis Presley, ducklings and the Mona Lisa. Let’s hope I don’t get too carried away, though. . .

Sarcodes and Living Systems

Sarcodes form the bread and butter of the therapeutics used in the “Field Control Therapy” or “FCT” approach, as taught to us by FCT founder Savely Yurkovsky, M.D. (www.yurkovsky.com)

Conceptually they lie on the frontier between two of the most widely practised forms of alternative medicine – sharing with Traditional Chinese Medicine its emphasis on energetically assessing and treating individual organs and organ relationships, and yet also sharing with homeopathy the depth of its remedies based on information fields.

On all of the courses which I teach with Kevin Eakins, ND, we make extensive use of sarcodes, and teach our students how to make and use them effectively. We also adapt their use to different needs, ranging from practitioner level to more basic uses – so that on the forthcoming FCT Foundation Course we will be teaching (for the first time ever) a wide range of basic applications of sarcodes which can be learned by anyone within 5 days, and applied either on their own or as a complement to any other therapy. I do not know of any other courses being offered in the world today which focus primarily on sarcodes, as those of Dr Yurkovsky and ours do, and in particular the many intelligent, sophisticated applications of them which we have learned from Dr Yurkovsky, thanks to his decades of innovation in this area.

My thanks go to Dr Yurkovsky for teaching us all about sarcodes, how to use them and why they are so important to clinical practice. And for demonstrating how incredibly effective they can be in even the most serious “untreatable” diseases – so long as they are used intelligently, guided by “decision science.” And how they can help steer the future of medicine as a leading remedy to make Living Systems Medicine an actuality.

Living Systems Medicine – the approach to medicine I advocate as the most effective and science-based – is all about assessing the human body as a living system which is deeply inter-connected – within wider systems (environment, eco-system, society, etc.), and with sub-systems within it (our internal organs and tissues).

Logically, then, wouldn’t it be great – and make perfect sense as a tool – if we could have a means of both assessing and treating any of hundreds of individual organs and tissues (sub-systems) within the body, as a central part of our plan? What if we could test the health status, and raise the vitality, functionality and health, of any organ or tissue, diseased or otherwise, and no matter how inaccessible, with an easy, non-invasive method? And what if, in doing so, we could successfully slow and/or reverse serious pathologies?

Even for readers sceptical of homeopathy, imagine for a moment that such a thing might be possible – and what an exciting prospect it would be! Surely worth a full evaluation?

To me, this is in itself a revolutionary thought – even just daring to hope for a thing like this that, if achievable, would change the face of medicine, how it is practised and what is deemed possible.

Happily, sarcodes make this ambitious goal a reality!

Our focus on sarcodes above any other form of therapeutic intervention is not by coincidence or chance, but due to at least two reasons: (1) Their amazing effectiveness in a wide range of medical applications (when used in the proper way – as for many decades previously they had been mis-applied: at ineffective potencies, not used in effective sequences nor in effective environmental conditions, and not correctly chosen for each individual); (2) The even more astounding consideration of the reasons that they work as they do. Let’s take a closer look. . .

Nature of a Sarcode – and of Homeopathy

First, on a pragmatic note – for those who don’t know yet – what is a “sarcode” actually made of? It is, in essence, just a bottle of plain water (chemically), but one that has been infused with the “information fields” (or “homeopathic imprint”) of healthy organ tissue. This is done to varying degrees, which is called “potentization” – and the resulting remedy strengths are called “potencies,” ranging from low (weak signal input) to high (strong signal input).

So for example, a “sarcode” of the bone marrow is labelled “Bone Marrow” and given to raise the health of a patient’s bone marrow. The same is performed for literally hundreds of different body areas – such as heart, lungs, kidneys, liver, bowel, bladder, brain, adrenals, thyroid, thymus, pituitary, spinal cord, pancreas, spleen, stomach, hypothalamus, lymphatics, gall bladder, ovaries, prostate, individual nerves, bones, muscles, joints, coronary arteries and so on – allowing practitioners to focus with precision on health problems in those areas. Another name sometimes used for sarcodes is “homeopathic organs.” The sarcodes used in FCT are also often referred to as “FCT remedies” or “Energized water.”

These various terms overlap because the element that’s common to all is that the practitioner is not seeking to deliver biochemical molecules to the patient’s body, but vibrational information, or “information fields.” The reason for why you would want to do so is apparent in the many previous blogs at this site which discuss what we mean by the phrase “information fields.” Modern physics research has led us to the conclusion that everything in the universe – including our internal organs – is composed of vibrational “strings” or packets of “informational” waves, and so all we are doing is applying this fundamental science to medical practice.

Or, to put it another way, we’re turning a nineteenth-century paradigm of conventional medicine (which is still in vogue with the orthodoxy) into a twenty-first century paradigm upgraded to incorporate scientific progress across multiple disciplines. This doesn’t involve rejecting conventional methods – but adding to them. That’s what I mean by “revolution in medicine” – because I view this as a “giant leap” forward for mankind, no less than when Neil Armstrong stepped onto the surface of our beloved moon. . . or perhaps even more so!

The Concept of a Medium – Carrying Information

The water is just the medium, and so it is not the chemical constituents of the remedy which deliver the therapeutic input.

When you have some tea, you don’t drink the cup that holds the tea – the aim is not to deliver molecules of cup to your stomach (!), but rather, what’s contained within it. The cup is just a carrier.

Similarly, when you look at an oil painting, you’re seeing physical paints (chemicals), but they are just the carrier or medium for various colours which travel through the air as light beams and enter your eyes, delivering a packet of “information” to your brain which is then perceived as an image.

If you go to Paris, you’ll see for yourself that there is, in fact, no Mona Lisa on the canvas displayed in the Louvre – there are only specks of dye. Yet clearly they have been arranged “intelligently” so that they carry a meaning that’s conveyed to the viewer, as a form of information. Another key observation is that there is, of course, a universality to the ordered grouping of this information in the dyes, i.e., people from all around the world can stand and look at the painting and nearly all of them will perceive a lady’s face and wry grin, not just a random blob of dyes.

Or ditto for when you watch the television. Have you ever thought about just how mad that really is? Yet watching TV is no madder than homeopathy – they are both simply phenomena utilizing modern physics knowledge concerning information fields and waves to perform a useful function in society. . . Specifically, waves are being utilized, in both cases, to carry information.

When you watch the telly, are you seeing just a bunch of flickering specks of light, or do you perceive what it represents to your brain in terms of the image of people formed on the screen? Physically, you are not actually seeing a person – only specks of light generated mechanically in front of you. Yet the television’s signals contain “informational” content that is meaningful to your brain. In like fashion, think of a sarcode of an organ as delivering an “informational” package that is meaningful to the corresponding organ.

Once you comprehend the essential “good sense” of this explanation, you’ll never again have any problems understanding sarcodes, FCT therapeutics or homeopathy!

Use of sarcodes can be considered a sub-branch of the therapeutic tradition known as “homeopathy,” although not the type which is most popularly practised by traditional homeopaths. Sarcodes are championed, instead, by Field Control Therapy (FCT) practitioners. For any readers who enjoy delving into the writing of Dr Savely Yurkovsky, founder of FCT, this is a good moment to note that when he refers to “homeopathy” he is often actually describing FCT – which can be defined as a school of homeopathy, although it can equally be defined as a unique therapy in its own right.

In short, there is overlap but there are also major differences in approach. Having said that, FCT and traditional homeopathy are completely compatible, and are best practised together in the same clinic.

Think of a Sarcode as being like an Elvis CD!

Picture a CD which is apparently just a piece of plastic, but onto which you have burned some Elvis songs. Simplistic as this sounds, images like this have helped generations of practitioners to understand homeopathy.

Where are these songs? They cannot be seen on the plastic, and if you send the plastic to a laboratory, you’ll get it sent back with a “return to sender” sticker. You’ll be told by an academic, and with a tone of authority in his voice, “Nope, you’re a charlatan selling pieces of plastic to people and claiming that they have music recorded on them! I have proven in my laboratory that this is just a bit of plastic, and there is no music that can be seen under my microscope!” Time, then, to shut down the homeopaths now that the CD has been summarily dismissed? Actually no – since these are clearly fallacious grounds for dismissal!

This, in essence, is the reason why homeopathy in general has come under fire for so long: it remains an essentially misunderstood form of medicine.

Doctors have in general not been trained to apply information physics to medicine. Explaining homeopathy to those who know little about it (e.g. such as most doctors and journalists!) can be a bit like explaining a CD to a caveman who thinks it’s just a round piece of shiny plastic. In the face of your protests, he might as well have a wooden heart and think you’re the devil in disguise, for all the good it will do. . . you’ll make no progress where there is a lack of understanding of how CDs work!

The moral of the story, perhaps, is that before you write something off, surely it’s best to make sure you assess it using the correct tools and implements! After all, there’s no point trying to “spot” some Elvis Presley recordings under an electron microscope – you won’t find them there!  No matter how strong the magnification, there will no voice forthcoming, drifting up through the lens, saying, “Don’t step on my blue suede shoes.” You could have the best lab facilities in the world, and still it will never happen! Wrong tools are wrong tools. . .

You’ll need to put the CD into a CD player to find (i.e., hear) them. Simple as that. . . But try telling that to “hound dog” homeopathy sceptics – and you won’t get very far, as many of them have already made their minds up that “them there CDs don’t contain no music, and I ain’t gonna listen no more!”

The solution is simple – the “CD player” for a homeopathic remedy is the human body and its organs, and centuries of practitioners, as well as many scientific studies, can attest to the “music” that it then plays, whether or not this “jailhouse rock” baffles the scholars!

The main thrust of my argument here is not to convince anyone or prove anything. Instead, I’m attempting to offer up some simple analogies and reasoning to explain why homeopathy is, in fact, entirely plausible. When the chips are down, the principal argument driving the widespread rejection of homeopathy is the fact it appears essentially implausible to many people. And I can understand why, because it has been presented in the public eye without proper explanations. So if I can manage to get any readers even just to “flirt” with the concept of sarcodes as a plausible medical intervention, then I’ll already be pleased as punch. Hopefully you won’t walk away from this article with any conclusions, but instead with musings.

And for those readers already using sarcodes or other forms of homeopathy, this discussion may also help place it in the context of explanations and analogies that have helped many people to understand how it works.

Although my goal is not to prove anything in this article, it’s worth mentioning in passing that a number of researchers have begun to measure homeopathic remedies in new ways, such as for example changes in the biophoton outputs that have enabled the distinguishing of homeopathic remedies, which were “all shook up,” from non-potentized media which weren’t, and even separate potencies from each other. Again, I’m not talking about proof – this is not my task today. But is this not more fuel for the plausibility argument?

When certain “authorities” allege that homeopathic remedies are nothing more than sugar pills, we can also say that this is not true and has been disproven. It is, in fact, a little like taking two CDs, one with Elvis songs on, and one with no music on, and comparing them in a laboratory which does not have a CD player or any appropriate equipment. Naturally, the lab technicians will look at the two pieces of plastic (as would the caveman) and declare them identical. Claims that Elvis can be heard on one of them will fall on deaf ears. What can we expect, when all eyes are on the plastic, and not on the informational content contained within it as a carrier medium?

Sarcodes as a Resonance Therapy

To understand sarcodes, it may also be helpful to think of a vibrating fork.

Any musicians will know what I’m talking about. . . If you hit a tuning fork near a string instrument, the strings of the corresponding musical frequency will literally vibrate in response, making a sound. Then for strings out of tune, the fork sets the tone so that you can adjust the string and bring it back into tune.

This is known as the phenomenon of resonance – well-established in music, but which I’m applying in a different context: that of medicine.

This tuning fork analogy is especially true of sarcodes, since when giving, for example, a Lung sarcode to the lungs, there is a resonance effect.

First, what is a lung, anyway? Thanks to modern physics findings, we now know that a lung is not just a conglomeration of chemicals forming molecules, cells and tissues. More fundamentally, underlying all of this, a lung is a vibrational entity. Every lung cell is oscillating with electromagnetic and other subtle vibrations. These are not by-products of chemicals in the lung tissue. The lung tissue itself is essentially composed of these vibrations or information fields. Like it or not, modern doctors need to get up to speed with physics research and take this on board. . .

I wouldn’t even describe the lungs as like a musical instrument in an orchestra, because in music the instrument generates vibrations, whereas the fundamental nature of lung tissue is the other way round – that the vibrations are coming together to produce molecules of lung. That’s why a tuning fork may be a better analogy – since the sound of the fork can lead to the vibrating of strings nearby.

So now we give a Lung sarcode. What does it do? The remedy literally delivers its information field into the bloodstream, from where it circulates into the lungs and “tunes” or “attunes” or “aligns” the lung cells to its vibration (or, let’s say, its healthy information field of lung tissue).

It’s not that the remedy bypasses the level of chemistry. It penetrates deeper than chemistry, to the “domains” (using terminology from Professor William A. Tiller) that underlie and actively control the chemistry. So you can expect chemical changes to occur, not as a direct mechanical effect of the remedy, but as an indirect effect of changes in the underlying “Lung field” of the organ.

The effect of this typically lasts a few days, during which time increased detoxification and/or tissue repair can take place in the lungs, given that there are not environmental conditions blocking the healing process (such as electromagnetic fields, due to their inhibitory effects on various components of human physiology involved in detoxification and cell function).

If toxins are then released from the lung tissue, it may be imperative to also follow it up with sarcodes of other organs, to ensure those toxins are eliminated from the body and not just recirculated. This is why we use sarcodes often in sequences, and why a lot of time in FCT practice is spent determining the most optimal sequencing of sarcodes for each patient at each point in time.

So when taking FCT remedies, as a patient, one nice way of understanding what is being done (by at least the main type of remedy in use – the sarcode), may be to think of each remedy as being like a tuning fork for an organ or tissue which is in distress due to toxicity, infection, trauma or other causes. “There goes another drop under my tongue – to nourish my liver and make it hum!”

Most traditional homeopaths under-use “sarcodes.” However, in FCT practice, that is not so, and so FCT is changing the face of both homeopathy and medicine in general through emphasizing this type of remedy.

In my follow-up blog on this theme, I’ll continue by taking a look at the “sister” remedy of sarcodes – the ones we call “isodes.” I’ll also give an overview of homeopathy in general, and where sarcodes and isodes fit in to it. We can also take a brief look at how sarcodes and isodes are manufactured.

Time to Wrap Things Up

If you sometimes wonder how a “sarcode” works, you could from time to time think back to my propositions above – at least for starters – with regard to the following – and see if any of these images helps make something apparently esoteric seem more concrete, plausible and understandable:

- The information “carried” by paints on a canvas such as the Mona Lisa.

- The pixels of light on a TV screen – carrying information into our brains that is meaningful.

- The cup that carries a drink of tea within it.

- The CD that carries strangely invisible music on it – and requires we use a CD player, not a microscope, to hear Elvis long after he went to his grave (and yes, folks, he really did! Isn’t it strange that Elvis died and then his fans claimed he was still living, whereas Paul McCartney never died yet fans claimed he had. . . A little perverse on the part of the respective music fans, don’t you think? But now I’m getting sidetracked. . . In either case, the point for this article is that it doesn’t matter if they’re alive or dead if we want to hear them singing on our CD players, right? Much as I would like to see Elvis or Paul singing in my living room, the truth is that I can enjoy their music regardless of their absence. . . and that’s exactly what the word “homeopathy” represents, by way of parallel. As a sidenote, just in case any readers are Elvis fans, you may want to see how many hidden references to Elvis song titles you can count that I’ve slipped into this text for fun! For readers who aren’t Elvis fans, though, I apologise for my Graceland flippancy).

- The tuning fork that vibrates a string – as a Lung sarcode resonates with Lung tissue and attunes it to a healthier signal.

If any readers have found other useful or interesting ways of understanding or describing sarcodes or other forms of homeopathic remedy, or have experiences to share about their use, or are left with doubts or confusion after the above, by all means throw in your penny’s worth below.

On an exciting closing note – sarcodes can also be made up and used to treat sub-cellular structures – such as DNA.

Yes, forget the rising multi-million euro beast of “gene research” rearing its head. . . Here is a free and effective, non-invasive way of healing DNA damage on an organ-specific basis, removing genetic toxins like mercury and helping tissues to “switch on” good genes and “switch off” bad ones. Now that’s a proposition I find genuinely sexy to think about – and it thrills me that I use it on a regular basis in my own clinic.