Autism: Factors that engender and sustain it, and why current treatments and research have failed

May I invite you to attend my upcoming seminar on autism and ADHD (together with other topics including Lyme disease and bio-resonance testing), taking place in NY, USA, on 6-9 October 2011. Details here.

The article which follows contains new content never published elsewhere except very recently on my website. It is a free preview of some of the topics from my upcoming book, “Autism and ADHD – An Inescapable Epidemic. Whose Child is Next? True Roots and Solutions.”

“The problem lies not in the intentions, nor in the dedication of individuals, but as so often in the history of science, from a limitation in the prevailing paradigm or model that governs and limits thinking in any given era.” Thomas Kuhn, PhD (physics), Professor, Philosophy of Science at Harvard University

“That which is wrong in its primary matter, will be also wrong in its secondary matter.” Latin aphorism

An obscure disease only a few decades ago, today autism has emerged as a worldwide childhood epidemic. Tragically, its true roots remain obscure, its cures are sporadic and the failure of those treatments publicized is the rule. These alarming facts command the urgent analysis of all relevant issues related to autism, including serious misconceptions concerning this condition. According to my experience, these range from laymen’s social-cultural to professional science-related. This brief discussion will make it transparent how these misconceptions obstruct the solution to autism and how the “latest research discovery” or “new and better treatment” for autism mislead because the majority of these violate the fundamental rules of science.

Following is an overview of those misconceptions that have besieged the field of autism.

I. Social-cultural misconceptions concerning autism

Misconception #1: “My child does not have autism and that is why it is neither his nor our family’s problem.”

Why does this formally correct statement represent faulty reasoning from a broader perspective? Because autism, in the great majority of children, is not a genetic disease (contrary to the official version) but a product of acquired multi-organ destructive processes. It is, simply speaking, man-made by an onslaught of toxicological, infectious, medicinal and electromagnetic agents on the bodies and brains of autistic and also all children. If you do not understand this simple and unpleasant truth, you will never know the feel and function of a healthy brain and body and both you and your children will merely settle for some surrogate of these. In autism, that “something is wrong with this child” is simply, more obvious.

All of these agents are ubiquitous in modern societies, worldwide, where they have converged on all children and adults, but to a different degree. From this causative perspective of autism, its absence does not represent a “missed bullet” for our children because they are free of autism, but rather smaller “shrapnel” in their brains falling short of causing overt autism.

In my 20 year clinical experience to date, using bioresonance testing (the noninvasive and painless alternative diagnostic modality, based on physics and capable of directly tuning energetically into the internal organs), I have never encountered a child or an adult with an intact brain.

What does this mean? This means that even if you or your child is free of autism, the chances are that neither of your brains is free of malfunctions of all types – mental, emotional or other, such as insomnia or addictions – and that it cannot reach its full potential until the aforementioned morbid agents are properly addressed.

On what else do I base this? Recent official statistics stating that 100% of the modern population stores dangerous chemicals, such as neurotoxins and carcinogens, corroborate my findings. The addition of modern electro-pollution interacting with these environmental pollutants lodged in the brain, turns it into an electrified toxic dumpster. When properly treated with my system – FCT^® – using a novel homeopathic treatment and measures to address chemical and electro-pollutants, not only have children with autism, ADHD and learning disabilities been cured or benefited greatly, but so have these “normal” children, teens and adults. This improvement involves the following brain-related problems: compromised memory, concentration, comprehension, analytical capacity, mental stamina, creativity, sleep, mood (anxiety, depression, irritability, anger, “short fuse”), addictions, social phobias, OCD, bipolar disorder, and PANDA. Even grade “A” students found it easier to study due to enhanced comprehension and creativity.

Reiterating the main message: in all likelihood, neither you nor your child knows what a normal brain is like.

Misconception #2: “My child has autism and we need to take him to an autism specialist for treatment“.

This, paradoxically, is a complete oxymoron in any chronic disease, not just autism.

Autism is a multi-systemic, not brain-confined, disease encompassing many other organs (e.g. kidney, liver, blood and lymph) and systems (e.g. gastrointestinal, immune and endocrine). All these have led to the establishment and sustainment of autism by producing hundreds of systemic pathologies. Therefore, one can neither effectively treat autism through some isolated brain or DNA balancing acts, nor by inserting a child and his brain into an oxygen chamber, nor by hooking some machine to the brain. The truth here is that a brain injured by lodged bullets cannot become balanced through machines, pills, injectables or ‘special’ teaching methods. The bullets must be removed, first, in order that the brain can be restored afterwards on its own or by only minimal therapeutic efforts.

Misconception #3: “Our autism specialist and his/her professional organization do many different treatments and diets to address many problems, so their approach to autism covers it all.”

Attempting to address many abnormalities in autism or any other illness, on one hand, and being precise and effective, on the other, often stand far apart. Beware that the utilization of many treatments is never a sign of strength, but of weakness due to their low precision.

Now let us consider how bewildered “autism specialists”, before they unknowingly started misleading the public, had first been misled by their training.

II. Professional misconceptions

Practically 100% of those medical doctors turned alternative, following the inability of conventional medicine to solve chronic diseases through drugs, have paradoxically ended up cloning exactly the same flawed allopathic approach to medicine. What misleads them is the purported (and marketed as such) “natural” means of their new endeavor, making it ‘different’ and ‘progressive’. Yet, despite some progressive elements such as seeking the exact causes of illness, alternative treatments fail, too, in the majority of serious chronic diseases. Additionally, “natural” treatments are naively presumed not to cause harm but the rules of avoiding harm are neither taught nor practiced. In short, deficiencies in establishing or addressing the exact causes of illness have undermined alternative approaches in all chronic diseases, including autism. What is the root problem here? It stems from a biochemical-pharmaceutical model of practice that approaches the human body as a can of frozen soup containing bodily chemicals and organ meats plus added bad things – mercury, candidiasis, nutrient deficiencies or gluten,casein and other allergens. In the view of conventional and “holistic-natural” cookbooks, the soup ingredients just sit there, in the can-body, in their fixed frozen positions, and wait patiently to be bombarded by drugs or “natural” pharmaceuticals in autism or any other disease. The “bombs” are: vitamins, minerals, fish oils, glutathione, any substance alleged to enhance the brain or other “meats”, chelators, “detoxifiers”, “cleansers”, “balancers”, probiotics, or oxygen, all presumably being “good” treatments. Then there is the category of “anti”-bad things: anti-candida, anti-parasite, anti-virus, anti-leaky gut, anti-free radicals, and any other anti-. All of these “bombs” pile up daily, thanks to “new research” that is being swiftly channeled into products by medical merchants. These bombardments share commonalities with none being particularly “natural” or “good”.

1. They are all drug-like in nature since they are artificial and foreign in composition to the physiology of the body, because such substances, combinations, forms or dosages do not exist in nature. As do all drugs, they have side-effects whether these are obvious immediately or surface later.

2. They lack the ability to solve any chronic problem, be it autism or another, in a significant way or on a long-term basis. Even when they demonstrate the rare improvement in a strong constitution or shallow pathology, these treatments usually cannot be discontinued because they represent a pharmaceutical dependency rather than true healing. Once these medicinal bombardments or diets cease, the complete reemergence of the disease follows. An example is the asthmatic who seems better while on inhalers, shots, steroids or a strict diet. Once these are stopped, the asthma resurfaces because its root causes remain.

3. These pharmaceutical treatments, drug administrations in chronic diseases, or vaccinations are conducted virtually blindly, due to the great disparity between the alleged therapeutic interaction of a given product with a certain “ingredient in soup” presented in the medical literature and training, on one hand, and the actual reaction of the body of a child with autism or another disease, on the other.

This professional delusion of expecting a given pharmaceutical to find its exact “soup target” has long been debunked by well-established knowledge that has been ignored in allopathic medical training. The fact is that diagnostic tests, including the ones used in medical research, cannot determine the actual causes of deficiencies, imbalances and pathologies, because these tests cannot discern which toxicological, infectious or other morbid agents are present where it counts the most – inside the brain and other organs – whether in autism or other diseases. Also, a pharmaceutical agent, either drug or natural, is incapable of effectively addressing the true causes of chronic diseases.

So these facts alone doom the great majority of treatments for autism and other chronic diseases to a blind process of grasping at straws. That is why they are ineffective, unless one claims that the display of one cured case of autism per one hundred failed ones is “effective”.

In order to compensate for this lack of precision and the inability to distinguish the primary causes of autism from their numerous secondary effects, the “specialists” resort to treating autism by machine gun bombardments of “soups” with ‘goods’. The end result is exorbitant and unnecessary cost, even up to hundreds of thousands of dollars per autism patient. Yet, good results do not necessarily follow.

But the worst is yet to come.

These treatments, from fish oils to anti-mercury, candida or parasites, are dangerous because:

a) They are based on imprecise and often irrelevant information delivered by the aforementioned imprecise tests.

b) The allopathic model of medical practice and thinking, combined with a lack of relevant diagnostic information prevents these autism specialists from knowing that this mercury, candida, parasites, and leaky gut are all closely interrelated and codependent with unaddressed multi-organ malfunctions and deadly electromagnetic fields. Like a gigantic and instantly interfacing spider web, these have continuous and rapidly shifting interactions with one another during these treatments, thus sustaining and even exacerbating autism. Following these bombardments, gut fungi and parasites release heavy metals, antibiotics and other toxicants that worsen autism and overall health. The redistribution of heavy metals (such as mercury) to the brain and other organs, induced by chelators, goes undetected by the diagnostic tests in use. Instead of the treating specialists knowing exactly what transpired, they assume that they have done something “good” and that autism just needs more time and bombardments to resolve. Allopathic anti-candida and anti-parasite regimes are incapable of solving these (just as any allopathic regime is unable to cure chronic infections) because infections are sustained by immuno-deficiencies that lab tests cannot detect and pharmaceuticals cannot solve. The example of countless Lyme patients mutilated by anti-Lyme bombardments conducted by “Lyme-literate doctors” illustrates this concept fully. The mutation of microbes into more aggressive types often follows “anti-”treatments. Even a seemingly benign supplementation with probiotics, administered just as blindly (e.g., without bioresonance testing), may lead to the conversion of elemental mercury to a highly neurotoxic form, methylmercury, particularly in a child with autism.

Not surprisingly, some children brought to my office have lost all of their remaining speech and mental abilities with worsening of their autism, following these specialized autism therapies. Other children with autism (as shared with me by parents active in autism support groups) developed serious illnesses such as seizures or leukemia while undergoing autism treatments.

1. It is a scientific impossibility for pharmaceutical medicine, conventional or alternative, to procure any significant progress in autism or chronic diseases. The reason for this is that the human body, at its most fundamental level, is not regulated by biochemical “soups” and, therefore, cannot be constructively changed by “product-soup” interactions. The most fundamental level of human physiology is represented by cellular energy fields, and it is these that regulate the domain of body chemistry, which is of secondary importance. Therefore, only those diagnostic and therapeutic means that operate at the level of body energy, and are conducted properly, are ultimately capable of leading to cures. It needs to be stressed that the form of energy medicine used must be chosen with care since “energy healing” can be just as allopathic or imaginary, in that many in alternative medicine have succeeded in misconstruing and misusing it. Ironically, energy medicine must be firmly rooted in many conventional medical disciplines in order to be effective. Many of these energy healers lack this knowledge. Because of the same energy-physiology link, electromagnetic fields are just as destructive to the brain and body in autism (or in any human) as mercury, lead or arsenic.
2. The next blind spot in autism treatment is that without bioresonance testing and proper understanding of the principles of toxicology, autism specialists are unable to form proper priorities in autism treatment. They cannot tell which findings are important or discern the sequence in which they must be treated, ignored, or addressed later. Likewise, they cannot predict which products for autism, pharmaceutical or energetic, are useful or harmful. Again, the diagnostic limitations preclude this knowledge. As a result, all findings, according to the “latest research” or “how to” workshops, become therapeutic targets. This professional blindness leads to the autism doctors falling prey to medical merchants who brainwash them into the use of their products, most of which are useless or dangerous (and not only for autism). Yet, these products become blindly loaded into the machine gun of autism theories and treatments. Even such an irrational a theory that autism is caused by genetic Lyme disease (introduced by another ‘innovative’ group) has been embraced by gullible autism doers. This, among many examples, reflects a disturbing conflict where the benefit of alternative medicine in presenting potentially useful ideas becomes devoured by gullibility or virtual ignorance.

Yet, the most peculiar agenda in autism therapeutics is the agenda that these treatments are science-based. Conventional doctors, incidentally, have all been trained with the same agenda assuring them that their treatments are science-based, too. But science covers a broad base of findings with their corresponding levels, meanings and hierarchy of importance, and they have not been trained how to distinguish, analyze, grade and connect these levels. The best kept secret here is that not only the lay public, but even most of the doctors, medical scientists and researchers aren’t even aware what all this means. [This issue has been addressed in great detail in my forthcoming DVD, "The power of missing knowledge: An explanation for the failures of conventional and alternative medicine in chronic and degenerative disease. An introduction to FCT."]

III. Misconceptions concerning medical science and research coming to the rescue of children with autism or any chronic disease.

If one was to name the single most deceptive issue in the era of modern civilization, it would be by far the prevailing misunderstanding of the essence of science, even by doctors and medical scientists themselves. This is virtually unavoidable in those branches of science known for their inexactness, such as medicine, psychology or philosophy. Inexactness underscores the tendency for unreliability, unpredictability, and uncertainty. These critically undermine the full understanding of and proper connectivity between numerous scientific findings, all of which are necessary to solve such difficult and complex problems as autism and all chronic diseases. Without a clear understanding of this key subject – a superb understanding of the true value of scientific findings and their optimal connections – the use of the term “science” (as it has been misused in relation to these inexact sciences such as medicine) borders on blind cult worship. At the very core of this worldwide tragic mass deceit based on the term “science’” lie many genuine successes produced by the exact sciences and successful technologies and products based on them. That is why the term “science” can hypnotize and mislead us. Among the exact sciences are: physics (classical and quantum), mathematics, chemistry, materials science and their applied technologies – telecommunication, computer, automobile, aerospace, construction and others. However, since many, including doctors, lack perception of these key distinctions between the exact and inexact sciences, they blindly trust that allopathic medicine, in spite of its consistent failures in the care of chronic diseases and autism, is verging on a breakthrough at any time. The term “science” has come into play here like a computer virus that has infected minds making them more easily exploited by multi-trillion dollar enterprises intertwining medical research, practices and products. Realizing the inexactness of medicine allows an understanding that its “science” could be anything on a spectrum of something valuable to mediocre to a transparent marketing gimmick.

In contrast to the main preoccupation of medical research, the essence of science has little to do with piles of scientifically discovered facts. It isn’t even one of its important goals to just pile up facts or findings concerning either autism or the cosmos. Their true importance can be understood only if one perceives science as a multi-level warehouse of knowledge to be used to construct capable models or “machines” with these facts as if from engineering parts. These machines seek to solve different problems, whether to deepen our understanding of nature or to solve technological, medical, economic and other problems. The better the constructors of these machines are in selecting and connecting the right parts, the more problems these machines can solve. For this, scientists must possess sufficient knowledge and creativity in order to properly connect staircases within this multi-level building, as noted by the American Nobel laureate, physicist Murray Gel-Mann. In this process, many scientific facts may never be used due to their mediocrity or irrelevance, whereas medicine is known to accrue piles of mediocre facts.

Besides the fact that one cannot get a course or diploma in creativity, as there is no program to produce Einsteins and Mozarts, the best kept secret in medicine is that the notion and principles of multi-level scientific knowledge is not taught to either conventional or alternative practitioners or researchers. Their entire training is limited to some isolated warehouse shelves as selected by corresponding specialty fashions and foods. These shelves are presented authoritatively through textbooks and training as “this is the way”, without anybody suspecting the difference between the isolated shelves and a building of well-integrated knowledge. This becomes evident later on, once the “fruit” of this scientific process – medical practices and products – reaches its final destination (and the one that counts the most), a patient’s bedside in autism and other chronic diseases. There, the “fruit” fails, triggering another round of haphazard shelf-shaking referred to impressively as “scientific research”, to only fail again and trigger exactly the same “scientific” replay. In conventional medicine, the “fruit” is a “better and new drug” – in alternative medicine, you name it.

Shelf thinkers – medical researchers – are unaware that their constructed machines conflict with important scientific knowledge since the missing connections preclude them from realizing what that knowledge even is.

Such machines are capable of delivering only illusions of solutions.

This process of the skillful assembly of knowledge holds true for all the stages involved in solving autism and other diseases – focused research, diagnostic means capable of establishing the true causes of autism, and effective therapy and prevention to address these causes. Likewise, identifying obstructions (“blocks”) to even the best treatment for autism is as crucial as establishing such a treatment itself. By far, the biggest external block to autism recovery is electromagnetic fields (EMFs) which are destructive to both the human brain and immunity. The recent rise in brain tumors is linked to EMFs, and these have soared by some 30 million-fold over only a century, thereby far outpacing our genetic adaptation capacity. Here too, as every step of the way, proper diagnostic method is crucial in testing electromagnetic protective devices, and not with gadgets but with actual human bodies, otherwise one becomes an easy prey to the ‘protective’ claims of the sellers of these devices. Anyone who has the necessary skill in bioresonance testing (only a few, unfortunately) can establish in seconds that 99.9% of these devices are either ineffective, or, even worse, convert electromagnetic fields into even more health-destructive fields.

In a nutshell, contemporary medical research and its fostered medical practices are catastrophically deficient in these key stages concerning autism and overall healthcare, such as focused research, effective diagnostic, therapeutic and preventative means, and an awareness of EMF and other environmental morbid factors.

Thus, expecting a breakthrough in autism and chronic diseases from medical research as it is practiced today would be as unrealistic as expecting bicycle mechanics to suddenly engineer sophisticated space rockets.

Speaking of space rockets, the human body, particularly in very complex and largely mysterious states such as autism and all other chronic diseases, is countless times more complex and difficult to know and control than any rocket. This is for the simple reason that even a million-part rocket is a unit that is completely understood and controlled by rocket engineers. However, in medicine, many significant aspects of autism and chronic diseases constitute unknown and poorly controlled “black holes”. These black holes in knowledge concerning the true causes of autism, and the inability to sort out the piles of scientific facts generated by autism research, doomed it to being a mere grasping at straws process or a machine gun science. Following are just a few examples of this in autism:

“Leaky gut has something to do with autism.”

“Deficiency of antioxidants and vitamins has been found in autism.”

“Mercury must have caused autism.”

“Vaccines caused autism.”

“Testosterone in boys has something to do with autism.”

“Autoimmune reactions damaged the brain in autism.”

“Too many free radicals cause autism.”

“Low glutathione levels have been detected in autism.”

“Lyme disease in a parent causes autism in a child”.

“Allergic reactions to gluten and casein have something to do with autism.”

“Environmental chemicals caused autism.”

“This enlarged part of the brain has something to do with autism.”

“This shrunken part of the brain has something to do with autism.”

“Mitochondria abnormalities have been present in autism.”

“Inflammation is causing brain damage in autism.”

“Large heads have been noted in autism.”

“Small heads, too, have been present in autism.”

“Brain white substance has been swollen in autism.”

“Candida and parasites are present in autism.”

“Faulty methylation causes autism.”

“Low cholesterol has been linked to autism.”

” Damaged brainstem, adrenals or thyroid have been noted in autism.”

“Cranial abnormalities have been found in autism.”

“Enzyme, peptide, omega-3 deficiencies are all present in autism.”

“Abnormal gut bacterial flora has something to do with autism.”

“Just discovered brain virus must be causing autism.”

“Brain neurotransmitter imbalance is present in autism.”

“Epigenetics have something to do with autism.”

“Brain oxygen deficiency is present in autism.”

“Bad DNA and genetics have caused autism.”

“Too much ultrasound exposure in pregnancy has caused autism.”

“Effect of propionic acid on mice brains resembles something that has something to do with autism.”

The list is longer and as in any chronic disease never comes to an end as the next day floods doctors and parents with another wave of “autism research news”.

From the perspective that one cannot arrive at the solution to a problem without considering all of the potentially relevant findings, there is nothing wrong with the existence of many facts, per se, which seem to be related in significant or insignificant ways to autism. However, from here, what will really matter is whether these findings will lead us in a straight path toward a solution to autism or to blindly wander in the jungle planted with these findings.

Here is a simple illustration that reflects how research findings lead to solutions in the exact sciences and how scientific findings usually mislead in medicine, both conventional and alternative.

Yes, the dots in the medical warehouse are formally scientifically correct, as they do exist. The diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in use are formally scientifically correct as these, correspondingly, do detect something and then act on this. Yet, all this, in a nutshell, is at the very heart of this mass deceit because no one really knows the importance of what has been chosen and connected, or the true consequences of these treatment acts. Thus, this circuitous guessing game that started with some research findings of uncertain value for solving autism and chronic diseases, completes itself in the human body.

This dot illustration carries a great practical meaning as these dots can easily run …. in the billions! As correctly noted by Harvard pediatric neurologist, Martha Herbert, MD, a screening for all possible combinations of some 100,000 chemicals present in our daily environment as potential causes of autism would require 84 billion tests! As another confirmation of this gigantic confusion in medicine concerning the significance of these dots, even the highest medical authority in the U.S., the National Institutes of Health (NIH), has recently indirectly admitted to this catastrophic problem. Its sound initiative – Translational Research – calls to support only those findings (dots) in medical research that have proven to be of real clinical value at the patient bedside. The real problem it reflects is that having spent trillions of dollars on research over 100 years to date, no one essentially knows why the produced dots have failed in all chronic diseases and autism, or how to grade their individual importance.

This encapsulates the nature of the current problem with autism concerning its origin and its diagnostic, therapeutic and preventative failures, as autism research is still being conducted through exactly the same research methods that have failed all chronic diseases. So, the new NIH initiative is doomed to fail unless the entirety of research and healthcare begins shifting from a chemical soup-pharmaceutical to a sound energy medicine-based model, since a mere new decree cannot turn bicycle construction into rocket engineering. This is the ultimate tragedy at the core of autism and all chronic diseases.

From this sad perspective both the doctors attending to and the unfortunate families caring for those with autism completely misperceive the true importance of scientific discoveries concerning autism. Every piece of something new emerging through professional journals, autism seminars and meetings, is perceived with heightened importance, verging on a breakthrough.

In the past, I have attended many of these “state of the art” scientific symposia on chronic diseases and autism, witnessing eager attendants grasping naively for “discoveries” presented by notable speakers. However, if pinned down on fundamental scientific issues, these speakers would fail to substantiate the true value of their discoveries in curing autism. During breaks, as was everyone else, I was surrounded by the flea market of merchants convincingly offering their “scientifically proven” products whose true value they understood just as poorly as the notable speakers understood their own speeches. Summing up this discussion, it is evident that the true solution to a problem always calls for addressing all its major aspects. As this concerns autism and the epidemic of brain disorders nowadays, there are several reasons why their solution has been derailed rather than advanced by medical science as it is being currently practiced. These reasons are:

1. poor scientific models largely leading to a machine gun type of unproductive research, as already mentioned. This is well-emphasized by Professor Kuhn’s quote (at the opening page of this article) from his internationally acclaimed book, “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions”, presenting how scientists get stuck and stagnate in their favorite grooves. The latter concerns an allopathic view of autism and all chronic diseases that focused entirely on pharmaceutical and chemical “soup-based” research. These were “convincingly” expressed by vaccinologist, Paul Offit, MD, in his recent books on autism. The media did bite into his “scientific” views on autism, as being of an “expert” vaccinologist, yet both seem to poorly grasp that such scientific views represent tunnel vision classics which border on scientific illiteracy, given the broader picture of autism and medicine in general.

2. fear of liability , by admission, from iatrogenic medical practices and, thus, excluding research projects that would confirm their iatrogenicity

3. deficient medical training rendering the practice of medicine largely inept to comprehend the true causes of autism and, thereby, incapable of addressing these properly and so solving autism

4. medical commercialism or the funneling of moneys into biomedical research that is contingent on its potential for returning profits via new products, not on the most effective ways toward solutions.

This has been the case with all chronic disease thus far, not just autism.

Besides the aforementioned inefficient research models and limited exposure to the broader sciences, according to Harvard Medical School faculty member, John Abramson, MD, medical doctors are not even trained how to analyze the research studies published in medical journals. In his book, “Overdosed America”, he states that it is very common that the conclusions of these studies, pitching the “scientific” advantage or safety of tested drugs, are simply baseless according to the entire study data.

Prestigious medical journals – the main information feed for doctors and the general media – somehow overlook these discrepancies, as their “take” from publishing “positive” drug studies can run up to a million dollars in marketing reprints purchased by the drug companies.

The book, “On the Take”, written by the former editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine and Professor of Medicine, Jerome P. Kassirer, MD, confirms how “the extensive conflicts of interest between pharmaceutical companies and the medical profession” (quote of the late Senator Edward M. Kennedy) “promote dangerously misleading medical information” (publisher’s quote).

5. Human Tribalism – As is reflected in greater detail in my forthcoming DVD, “The power of missing knowledge: An explanation for the failures of conventional and alternative medicine in chronic and degenerative disease. An introduction to FCT” and my forthcoming book, “Autism and ADHD – An Inescapable Epidemic. Whose Child is Next? True Roots and Solutions”, this innate trait of the human psyche, animalistic in nature, is perhaps the greatest obstacle in the way of all progress (including scientific) in civilization. This is particularly evident in the field of medicine where gross deficiencies in training and scientific inexactness preclude differentiating between approaches and statements based on their true scientific worth versus those based on the lower tribal drives meant to protect one’s professional or commercial territory. And, the facts are that scientists or doctors, on the whole (just as the rest of the human breed), have yet to display immunity from these drives.

These obstacles will not be overcome by the traditional type of autism research or the autism research foundations that sponsor this research. That is why when I approached some of these foundations (such as Autism Speaks) to test my successful treatment of autism, and presented its scientific logistics, the staffers displayed outright indifference. Keep in mind these are the people who gather tens of millions of dollars from their donors to find a cure for autism. Logistically, a solution to autism or other illness by an outsider would threaten the tribal territory of an organized science including its multimillion dollar flow from naive sponsors. If these sponsors understood something of essence about science, instead of just being impressed with “big name” researchers displayed as the store window of many similar foundations, they would have easily realized that one cannot expect a company of private detectives whose search methods have consistently failed in all chronic diseases to apprehend the solution.

Another “progressive” research body – Autism Research Institute (ARI) – has been equally “enthusiastic” about my proposal to share the successful FCT treatment of autism with DAN doctors. My presented concrete facts and the reasons for a flawed DAN approach to autism including its side-effects were left without response. This only confirms the tragic reality that when the “researchers” turn themselves into a corporate body, the fiscal/tribal/corporate interests tend to prevail over the very purpose of its existence – autism or other diseases. These corporate dynamics dominate the entirety of medicine, conventional and alternative.

Knowing our common human logic, the most “logical” argument I foresee against the information presented here would be “how could this be that he might be right and so many prominent scientists and organizations are wrong?” However, such a question, from the standpoint of scientific logic, is completely illogical simply because that particular science is not based on our common logic. And that is why it is not fazed by the magnitude of the titles or supporters, unlike the tabloids and general media. Science operates on essences of the subjects under examination. So, if my contentions expressed here are wrong, one is very welcome to defeat these based on substantiated arguments.

This and many other medicine and science-related subjects have been presented in greater detail in my forthcoming DVD: “The power of missing knowledge: An explanation for the failures of conventional and alternative medicine in chronic and degenerative disease. An introduction to FCT^®“. Its purpose is to expose the multiple errors that arise from the inexactness in medicine, yet which become readily accepted in both conventional and alternative practices. Also, it is to introduce a new medical system whose principles are based on those of the exact sciences.

Far more expanded and detailed mechanisms and factors, and numerous clinical cases of autism and many brain disorders, will be presented in my upcoming book, “Autism and ADHD – An Inescapable Epidemic. Whose Child is Next? True Roots and Solutions”, and in seminars on autism and brain disorders.

FEEDBACK: